Jump to content

St Mirren Game


Recommended Posts

Posted

So the logic for dropping Esson is not that he has played badly but that a new keeper may make the difference between having a clean sheet or not. How is Tuffey meant to improve the communication for the defence when he has hardly played!. Unbelievable.

Come on Huisdean this is caleythistleonline , half these posters dont have a clue !

Posted

And I wonder why I can't be ****** with this site now a days, I was just something else to consider.......

Posted

:

So the logic for dropping Esson is not that he has played badly but that a new keeper may make the difference between having a clean sheet or not. How is Tuffey meant to improve the communication for the defence when he has hardly played!. Unbelievable.

Come on Huisdean this is caleythistleonline , half these posters dont have a clue !

:thumbup:

Posted

So the logic for dropping Esson is not that he has played badly but that a new keeper may make the difference between having a clean sheet or not. How is Tuffey meant to improve the communication for the defence when he has hardly played!. Unbelievable.

Come on Huisdean this is caleythistleonline , half these posters dont have a clue !

And the other half only think they have a clue. :rolleyes:

.

Posted

The answer is obvious - Esson remains in goals and Tuffey plays up front.

tuffey being on all set plays as he obviosly practises them the most and has the best strike out of all our players

Posted

Fancy a change

Agree. Esson is a good keeper but you have to admit he has conceded some soft goals this season. Motherwell at home is one example. Tuffey is also a top class keeper who's been biding his time waiting for a chance. If 18 games without a clean sheet isn't enough to give him a shot what is? It's not just about shot stopping. Tuffey is much more vocal in organising the defense, which is exactly what we need.

Posted (edited)

There's an old saying that goes "a goalkeeper is only as good as his defence", well I think this season Esson's been far better than his defence and had it not been for him on many occasions then ICT would be in a far worse state points wise than they are now. Dropping him at this time, when stability more than ever is key, would be nothing but downright stupid.

Edited by Renegade
Posted

Good point too Ren, we have had lots of different back fours so let them settle, Give Shinnie G another shot don't seem to remember him making to much mistakes.....

Posted (edited)

I wonder if the problem with the defence, is that as a lot of teams line up 4-4-2, when ICT play a back four they are marked by the two centre-back with little to no cover. I wonder if a back three would solve the problem (lets be honest, it can't get any worse!). With that in mind I'd go with -

Esson

Tokely Hogg Golobart

Hayes Davis Tansey A.Shinnie Foran

Tade McKay

Subs - Tuffey, Gillet, Piermayr, Sutherland, G.Shinnie, Cox, Ross

Golobart and Tokely to provide the height in defence with Hogg as a kind of sweeper. St.Mirren play usually play with two good strikers IIRC. Also play Foran deeper as he seems to perform better there and give McKay a chance with Tade.

Edited by Renegade
Posted

Just to get everyone in the mood for a goalfest, ICT again feature in the BBC website's SPL Classic with the 3-3 draw in Paisley back in February this year.

SPL Classic 3-3

Couple of good finishes from some lad called Rooney, but the highlight for me is Esson's save at the end.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy