Jump to content
FACEBOOK LOGIN ×

Political Stance


DornochCaley

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How do you know they have the highest standard of literacy in the world? Because the communist regimes reports say so? Lol, take that with a grain of salt. And what use is literacy if the government tells you what websites and books you can and can't read? :lol:

Literacy rates in Cuba in 2002

Female over 15 years 99.79092216%

Male over 15 years 99.80731392% Joint over 15 years 99.79907436%

Female 15 - 24 years 99.9536914%

Male 15 - 24 years 99.95740613% Joint aged 15 - 24 years 99.95560368%

Source :- Gapminder website

If they're not the highest in the world they can't be from it.

Incidentally, life expectancy in Cuba is 78 years compared to 79 years here or 42 in impoverished areas like Dingwall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's neo-liberal, am I a communist?

Economic Left/Right: -3.25

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.38

post-2081-1260988379.png

Me, Mahatma Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama. Where did I leave those sandals?

I'd say no. You obviously don't advocate state intervention in regard to the laws surrounding the individual. In some senses it's strange to see Mandela out there as the ANC was, for many years, classified as a communist party. However, after the fall of apartheid, RSA ended up with a Rainbow Constitution - arguably the most liberal constitution ever written.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Wow Latin America! It must be amazing if you can have better record against than such juggernauts as Guatemala and El Salvador...

I'll bite, what do you mean by juggernauts?

There are also other countries in Latin America such as Brazil, Peru. Argentina, Mexico, Uraguay to name but a few.

Having eliminated child malnutrition is not to be scoffed at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow Latin America! It must be amazing if you can have better record against than such juggernauts as Guatemala and El Salvador...

Its not as if Britain has been free of Child Malnutrition for a while is it? Infact its not been long at all. So for a country who is boycotted by the biggest industrial power on earth, then Cuba are doing brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing that so many people try to leave this Cuban paradise by swimming 70 odd miles to Miami. Clearly those people haven't been reading the latest UNICEF reports!

I don't think it's fair to compare a still-developing country subjected to sanctions to the world's only real superpower. Try comparing it to Venezuela, Brazil or some other Latin American country of similar development.

I think the trade embargo that has been imposed on Cuba for over 50 years means that there is no comparison to be made - even with other Latin American countries. While Cuba's achievments in health and education are admirable, the authoritarian nature of the regime has not been diluted in that time and the people have simply had enough. The moment that the Soviet Union collapsed was the beginning of the end of socialism on that island. Without powerful allies, and with an economy concentrated on something as volatile as sugar, Cuba's system was simply unsustainable. In recent years it has been forced to open its doors to tourism and to dollars sent by the Miamian diaspora. Anyone with access to either of these sources of income can make more money in a day than highly trained public servants do in a year. Socialism in Cuba is dead and i predict that the regime that created it will be gone within the next decade.

No doubt the neo-liberals will turn a blind eye to the increasing numbers of Cubans who make their way across to Florida as they toast the freedom of Cuba.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the trade embargo that has been imposed on Cuba for over 50 years means that there is no comparison to be made - even with other Latin American countries. While Cuba's achievments in health and education are admirable, the authoritarian nature of the regime has not been diluted in that time and the people have simply had enough. The moment that the Soviet Union collapsed was the beginning of the end of socialism on that island. Without powerful allies, and with an economy concentrated on something as volatile as sugar, Cuba's system was simply unsustainable. In recent years it has been forced to open its doors to tourism and to dollars sent by the Miamian diaspora. Anyone with access to either of these sources of income can make more money in a day than highly trained public servants do in a year. Socialism in Cuba is dead and i predict that the regime that created it will be gone within the next decade.

No doubt the neo-liberals will turn a blind eye to the increasing numbers of Cubans who make their way across to Florida as they toast the freedom of Cuba.

The trade embargo has ensured that the socialist state has remained in place - it's a massive US policy failure. If they got rid of it the regime would be gone far sooner. As it stands, the semi-siege economy remains in place and the Soviets have been partially replaced by Venezuela, who trade oil for doctors. However, when Venezuela's economy collapses (they devalued their currency last week and Chavez' policies have made the country a complete basket case) it will face the same situation again.

I like the phrase 'The Miamian Diaspora'. It sounds like a Nu-Prog band that would support the Mars Volta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pros and cons in both systems. Takes us back to thinking of Isaiah Berlin's positive v negative liberty theory. Do Cubans want a free Market economy which operates in a global, volatile state, or stick with things the way they are? ICTChris makes a good point in relation to there being a seige mentality perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other side of tourism of course is that muggers have more opportunity to earn us dollars. :P

:rolleyes:

However, when Venezuela's economy collapses (they devalued their currency last week and Chavez' policies have made the country a complete basket case) it will face the same situation again.

No more of a basket case than the succession of US backed dictatorships and their Chicago School chums who have ravaged Latin America over the last few decades. At least Chavez is accountable to his electorate, most of which lives in dire poverty and sees an opportunity to redistribute some of the wealth and power that has been concentrated in the hands of a relatively small elite since the oil was discovered in the 20's. Personally, i don't have much faith in Chavez' domestic project. His lasting legacy will be the effect that his rhetoric and his race has had on the rest of the region. The idea that the indigenous and the poor can stand up to the power that has kept them down for so long is permeating throughout Latin America.

?El pueblo unido, jam?s ser? vencido!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other side of tourism of course is that muggers have more opportunity to earn us dollars. :P

:rolleyes:

However, when Venezuela's economy collapses (they devalued their currency last week and Chavez' policies have made the country a complete basket case) it will face the same situation again.

No more of a basket case than the succession of US backed dictatorships and their Chicago School chums who have ravaged Latin America over the last few decades. At least Chavez is accountable to his electorate, most of which lives in dire poverty and sees an opportunity to redistribute some of the wealth and power that has been concentrated in the hands of a relatively small elite since the oil was discovered in the 20's. Personally, i don't have much faith in Chavez' domestic project. His lasting legacy will be the effect that his rhetoric and his race has had on the rest of the region. The idea that the indigenous and the poor can stand up to the power that has kept them down for so long is permeating throughout Latin America.

?El pueblo unido, jam?s ser? vencido!

Point i was trying to get across. The US have backed so many Fascist dictators in Latin America. Without the US most the Dictators would never have came to power. The US have exploited South America for a long, long time. And they will continue to do so. Atleast Castro had the balls to stand up to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No more of a basket case than the succession of US backed dictatorships and their Chicago School chums who have ravaged Latin America over the last few decades. At least Chavez is accountable to his electorate, most of which lives in dire poverty and sees an opportunity to redistribute some of the wealth and power that has been concentrated in the hands of a relatively small elite since the oil was discovered in the 20's. Personally, i don't have much faith in Chavez' domestic project. His lasting legacy will be the effect that his rhetoric and his race has had on the rest of the region. The idea that the indigenous and the poor can stand up to the power that has kept them down for so long is permeating throughout Latin America.

?El pueblo unido, jam?s ser? vencido!

The wealth and power is still in the hands of a small elite, it's just they occasionally mouth Chavista slogans. The population of Venezuela still, in the main, live miserable lives beset by poverty and violence. The nationalisation programme by Chavez has seen shops lie empty due to his attempts to control food prices and the revenues from Venezuela's oil fields are falling due to inefficient production. Chavez also periodically moves his army to the border with Columbia. Is it really beyond comprehension that when the economy completely collapses Chavez might try and secure his power by a military move against Columbia?

The countries who were influenced by the Chicago School are the most prosperous and politically free in Latin America.

Point i was trying to get across. The US have backed so many Fascist dictators in Latin America. Without the US most the Dictators would never have came to power. The US have exploited South America for a long, long time. And they will continue to do so. Atleast Castro had the balls to stand up to them.

What's the difference between the Fascist dicactors and Castro? Try speaking out against the Castro revolution in Cuba, see what happens. Try using the internet, visiting another country, forming a free trade union or political association in Cuba. The main difference is that countries like Cuba allow left-wingers to indulge in Citizen Smith-style, anti 'imperialist' posturing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other side of tourism of course is that muggers have more opportunity to earn us dollars. :030:

When I went on a tour of Havana there was this mouthy Scouse tourist, wearing the biggest, chunkiest, gold chain I've ever seen. He proclaimed loudly to everyone "I'm not racist, but you've got to watch the darkies here". Anyway, the next day we were all heading back to Varadero when he got onto the the bus, minus the chain thanks to his aforementioned friends. To everyone's amusement, he'd spent the previous day at the police station whilst the rest of us experienced the most incredible city.

His muggers became wealthy by Cuban standards, but what can they spend their money on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy