Jump to content
FACEBOOK LOGIN ×

first banning order for ICT??


Gringo

Recommended Posts

Fair enough aye, but he's not been found guilty of anything yet. So by banning him from away grounds then they're handing out punishments for cases that haven't even been proven yet.

just for interest a few quotes from another Scottish football site....

This paragraph from today's SUNDAY HERALD suggests that being filmed by plod may be a very big deal indeed under McConnell's new banning order legislation:

' Strathclyde has confirmed that evidence gathered during surveillance operations against supporters is to be used to make “on summary” applications to the courts for bans. These are controversial as the orders can be granted even though the individuals have not committed any crime. '

maybe someone can fix the link to the herald story..

Orders can be granted even though the individuals have not committed any crime. is not opinion.

Neither is ' Chief Constables will also be able to apply to the courts to ban an individual from matches involving the national team and SPL or SFL even if they have not been convicted of an offence.........banning orders imposed without conviction can last for up to three years.'

Nor are the banning orders restricted to stadiums: ' New football banning orders would ban a person from attending specified football matches in Scotland. Courts could also ban individuals from certain pubs or town centres on match days.

We can of course be certain our kind understanding police forces will apply for them in a sympathetic manner and the authorities will ensure they are applied evenly across all clubs.

We can be equally certain that the forces of law and order will not flinch from arresting and banning those of minority groups who transcend - even if doing so is a catalyst for chattering representatives of those minority groups to scream ' We are persecuted victims '.

even more worrying in my opinion......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough aye, but he's not been found guilty of anything yet. So by banning him from away grounds then they're handing out punishments for cases that haven't even been proven yet.

Many people are given conditions to follow before they go to trial - not to approach any witnesses or go to certain places, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy