Number of postings were not brought forward.

[Scarlet Pimple]

I noticed some time back the huge disparty of  the number of posts between different posters.

Am I correct in thinking that when you converted to the new site you eliminated all postings made by regular users prior to the date of the changeover.

If so why did you not allow all these numbers for each individual poster to contine to be shown and accumulate? Would it not have more truly represented  the activity of posters who have been on here for several years?

:014:

[Scotty]

I noticed some time back the huge disparty of  the number of posts between different posters.

Am I correct in thinking that when you converted to the new site you eliminated all postings made by regular users prior to the date of the changeover.

If so why did you not allow all these numbers for each individual poster to contine to be shown and accumulate? Would it not have more truly represented  the activity of posters who have been on here for several years?

:014:

you are correct. when we moved from SportNetwork to our own hosting/design everyone started from 0 posts. This is because everything is held in a database and post counts are based on the actual post quantity held in the database. just as we could not take the posts themselves from SN, we couldnt take anything else either as the software was not compatible.

[Scarlet Pimple]

I knew that  :crazy07:

What also has surprised  me is the number of posts some folks have made since the changeover which seems to be phenomenal.

Don't they work? :003:

[SMEE]

Av seen ppl wi much more posts on other forums. I seen ppl who are on 20000+ posts on the u2 forum i go to after only being a member for 1 yr

[clacher_holiday2]

I seen ppl who are on 20000+ posts on the u2 forum i go to after only being a member for 1 yr

:015:

Sorry.