Can someone please clear up a point

[Alex MacLeod]

Are the Hibs pair on loan or not? I'm becoming very confused by different press reports. i.eFROM TEAMTALK

This thread has not been started to guage opinion on player quality or such. Just to find an answer to my question.

[jamie ictfc]

nope they are here on full contracts, hibs released them so they could join, but only on 6 month contracts

[PullMyFinger]

Both given contracts until end of season which gives Brew time to assess them and offer longer deals. A good bit of business if you ask me and I suspect we've got Donald Park to thank as well.

[KingBeastie]

Can someone please clear up a point

Aye, possibly. But don't ask for 3 - that'd just be pushing it!

[tm4tj]

You still drunk Macleod.

[+CaleyD]

Wouldn't have been possible for us to take both on Loan as you can only have one player over 21 on loan at any time.

SPL Handbook D5.4 from memory, I did quote it somewhere else on here last week.

[PullMyFinger]

SPL Handbook D5.4 from memory

[Harry Chibber]

nearly spat my lunch at the computer

[Scotty]

see this is turning into a proclaimers thread

but 'D' is right .... clubs can have up to 4 loan players at any one time, but only one of those players can be over 21. Think this also clears up the confusion about McNulty and Kerr being at Elgin as both are u21

[RiG]

SPL Handbook D5.4 from memory

:thumb04:

[SMEE]

Why has SPL got so many sh1t rules....loan 4 players, but only 1 over 21. Got to have 3 under 21's in the squad. ITS UTTER PISH! If anything...IMHO...its having the opposite effect of its initial intention.