Jump to content

Spl May Be Saved But........


Alex MacLeod

Recommended Posts

Obviously our board and DoF saw this coming and took evasive action just in time, managing to hang on to Brewster for so long could not have been easy, however, they should be congratulated for this masterstroke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: interesting angle mannie... congratulations are a bit out of order though, next thing will be for you to appear in the Heathmount and buy Brew a Pimms.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:finger03: interesting angle mannie... congratulations are a bit out of order though, next thing will be for you to appear in the Heathmount and buy Brew a Pimms.

Actually a bottle of Bud or Miller is his prefered tipple.

I suppose that will be yours as well then Alex. :024:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Sky and Espn are wanting a 5yr deal but "offering less than ?100m". So....?1M is less than ?100M, but then again, so is ?99M.

I thought Setanta had been paying about ?12M per season for the rights to show SPL? So even if the new deal is considerably under ?100M, it must still be as good as the SPL has ever seen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that can't be right as Lex Gold said the SPL would bring in at least as much money, maybe more, from a new tv deal. I mean, he must be right. His position would be untenable otherwise, so I'm sure he wouldn't say that through sheer blind optimism or spare himself a few blushes from his last deal being pants. Surely not :finger03:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that can't be right as Lex Gold said the SPL would bring in at least as much money, maybe more, from a new tv deal. I mean, he must be right. His position would be untenable otherwise, so I'm sure he wouldn't say that through sheer blind optimism or spare himself a few blushes from his last deal being pants. Surely not :finger03:

Is this the Setanta deal that disappeared when they went t.ts up?

If it was did he have an involvement with Setanta?

If the above blushes are from the Setanta deal and he had nothing to do with their demise, why is he at fault?

I thought the Setanta deal was voted on by the SPL clubs and they all voted, including ICT, for the Setanta deal over the Sky deal as the former offered more up front cash. The only clubs, I understand, that voted for Sky was the OF and Aberdeen.

How the other clubs must now be kicking themselves for opting for additional cash over financial strength. Maybe the three that voted for Sky had financial background advice from their advisors, no doubt at a cost but in hindsight, a small price to pay.

Now a lot of water has gone under the financial bridge since that vote, including a large loss of advertising revenue and to obtain any funding for our diddy league, at this time, must be a feather in the SPL cap!

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soon as I can find a bit of free time I'll put together a post about the direct colloration between the disparity in wealth between a leagues top and bottom teams, league standards and the ability for them to command better TV/Sponsorship deals. The information came from a conference I was at recently where William Gaillard, Senior Advisor to President of EUFA, gave a talk on the subject and basically pointed out that having a league where there's such a huge gap between the finances of the top and bottom teams is basically cutting the games throat....so much so that even the top teams suffer and don't realise their full potential.

Whilst Lex Gold may not be directly responsible for the demise of Setanta and the need for the SPL to take a vastly reduced package for the TV rights, he is overseeing an association which is driving down the value of the game in Scotland...he's not doing it single handed, but as the Chairman the buck stops with him at the end of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO the biggest problem to any deal is the fact that the top two clubs get 40% before other monies, i.e. league position payments etc, are divvied up.

I understand that the new deal will be worth ?40m less, over five years, than the ?125m that Setanta agreed to over four years. So, if Setanta were to pay around 30m a year, Sky/ESPN must be offering around ?17m a year. That 13m drop ia a lot to make up elsewhere.

Edited by Alex MacLeod
spell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The drop may be big but the alternative must have been frightening for the smaller SPL clubs.

At least with being on TV they will have an income from adverts around the ground that would have brought in next to nothing without TV.

Don, I take your point, so big a gap both financial and in wealth of talent of players, cannot allow true competitiveness within the SPL.

I do think we will realise that this year with the 1st div being so much closer in team ability and finance and therefore points. Am I correct in thinking that with maybe 70% of the games played last year, the gap between top and bottom was so tight that the 2nd bottom team could have been 2nd top if the results went right for them one Saturday.

Can't ever see that happening in the SPL except in the first few games.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which prompts the thought again as to why all the revenue is not shared between all the teams . This would surely result in a a more compettitive atmosphere, better players and skill from all teams and more excitemenmt on the park with more to play for other than avoiding relegation every other season.

Of course it is a sure bet that this will never happen with the Old Firm killing any such deal.

The problem for the Old Firm is this :

If the English Leagues don't want them and the other SPL teams all fall by the wayside financially one by one over a period of time who will be left to play agaisnt Rangers and Celtic. It's a fact that these two teams are feeling the pinch just as all the others are doing and their standard of play has , from all accounts, fallen. So they had better stay in Scotland otherwise they might get a very rude awakening in English football with a diminished income stream and a diminished reputation being an increasingly prevalent situation.

Thoughts on this ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B) interesting angle mannie... congratulations are a bit out of order though, next thing will be for you to appear in the Heathmount and buy Brew a Pimms.

Actually a bottle of Bud or Miller is his prefered tipple.

I suppose that will be yours as well then Alex. :024:

No...............Guiness and whisky for me if your buying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure setanta were offering ?125m over 4 years and the proposed new deal is less than ?100m over 5 years .

I think that ?125M deal was a huge leap on the deal the SPL just had with setanta tho. I remember thinking when i heard about it, thinking......how the hell will Setanta find the extra dosh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope it's as prevelant in the Middle East and North Africa as it has been. Honestly, I could watch on local and international Arabic TV, Libya Sport, Dubai Sport and Al Jazeera Sport. Only Germany and France perhaps came anywhere near close. Must be cheap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy