A moral footballing dilema

[chris123]

Picture the scene.

Smiths bubble bursts at Rangers and by the last day of the season there are 7 points off the leaders Celtic. However (for the sake of argument) Hibernian are 1 point behind them. Celtic have the early k.o. drawing with aberdeen. This means they are only 2 points ahead of hibs, who kick off at 3. They are playing us. We have already done everything we can do this season, and no matter the outcome of the game, we cannot move up or down a place. Hibernian have got to where they are by playing slick, exciting football and fielding some of the best scottish youngsters around. We have not had a non old firm champion for over 15 years.

Its simple, hibs win, they win the league. Hibs dont win, the league goes back to one of the old firm.

Would people still put a caley win first?

[SMEE]

ICT win every time. Let the rest take care of itself

[+Gringo]

I'm with SMEE...

Nice Avater by the way.....who is it.... :023:

[RDL]

Surely the moral position would be that the club that wins the most points over the course of the season should be champions. We shouldn't be throwing results for anyone, even if it would GIRU the OF.

[SMEE]

I'm with SMEE...

Nice Avater by the way.....who is it.... :023:

Am thinking you mean me here? if so.....its my bit on the side...KYLIE MINOGUE and her cute lil bum

[beachcomber]

nice attempt to smoke out the closet huns

[Kingsmills]

On balance, if the game was meaningless for ICT, I'd take a Hibs league win. If, on the other hand, even a single league place was at stake, I'd want ICT to prevail.

[TSTtiger]

if theyre good enough to win the league they'll get enough points

[ICTJackson]

Caley victory every time